My favourite stat to come from the
Microsoft takeover of Nokia has to be the increase in share value of 30% for
Nokia and the decline in share value of Microsoft of 5% on the same day the
purchase was announced. But does this stat demonstrate a flawed strategy for
Microsoft in looking to purchase the Finnish brand?
Nokia has suffered a long, drawn out and
deflating battle against the other mobile phone providers ever since 2003. In
the last ten years its market share in the UK alone has declined from 35 % to
14%. In a world where the mobile phone transformed into a camera, MP3 player,
Internet provider and lifestyle icon Nokia’s approach was just too slow and too
responsive to protect its position. The decline should be a stark warning to
all other brands of the dangers of taking your eye off the ball. Brands like
Nokia who once enjoyed such a dominant position in the market should not
experience such a dramatic and rapid fall from grace. There is a clear
worldwide trend of switching from mobile to smartphone technology and Nokia
just couldn’t keep up with this in the US, Europe and UK.
A lot has been said about the impact Apple
had on the US and UK market and how their love of disruptive innovation led to
a decline in sales for all the big players in the market. No one will ever be
able to deny the success Apple had in this field and the competitive advantage
they built through creating such a strong and transferable brand image. However
at the same time I hope that the ones who made the choices and decisions in
Nokia towers do not use this as an excuse for their rapid decline. When the
going got tough Nokia pure and simply had no answer to combat the entrance of
Apple into the mobile market and no protection strategy to fend off the
technology monster.
It may surprise some to know that up until
2011 Nokia was still one of the most popular brands in the UK. Brand index
scores suggest that there was still value to be seen in the brand especially in
the Western World whereas the US has tended to remain rather indifferent.
Why is this important? Well first of all it
demonstrates exactly why Microsoft are willing to spend billions of dollars in
purchasing the brand. Microsoft clearly see the value in acquiring a company
which can still boast of being the second largest mobile phone provider in the
world. Nokia’s position in the mobile market also provides a clear indicator of
Nokia’s strength in the ever-expanding Chinese market. Add this to the fact
that Microsoft worked closely with Nokia on the Lumia and all of a sudden a
number of possibilities for future growth and brand prosperity once again seem
possible for a mobile phone arm of Microsoft’s business.
So is Microsoft making the right decision
with the acquisition of Nokia and does this purchase spell the end of the best
thing to come out of Finland? Well on one hand Nokia have experienced
significant market decline and have done little to strengthen their product
offering or brand perception. However we must also consider that the brand
still enjoys a dominant position in the mobile market and a strong market position
in China. If Microsoft can leverage the value left in the brand name and focus
growth around dominance in China we may not have seen the last of Nokia and ‘snake’
yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment